
bash = Bourne again shell sh = shell csh = C shell tcsh = Tenex C shell (not tab-completion-extended C shell) tclsh = Tcl shell ksh = korn shell ash = a shell bash = bourne shell ? (in most Linux distributions it's a link to /bin/ash) zsh = the Z shell (it's what it's manual page tells about it .. :/ )A shell script is little more than a list of commands that are run in sequence. Conventionally, a shellscript should start with a line such as the following:
#!/bin/bash echo "hello, $USER. I wish to list some files of yours" echo "listing files in the current directory, $PWD" ls # list files
Firstly, notice the comment on line 4. In a bash script, anything following a pound sign # (besides the shell name on the first line) is treated as a comment. ie the shell ignores it. It is there for the benifit of people reading the script.
$USER and $PWD are variables. These are standard variables defined by the bash shell itself, they needn't be defined in the script. Note that the variables are expanded when the variable name is inside double quotes. Expanded is a very appropriate word: the shell basically sees the string $USER and replaces it with the variable's value then executes the command.
We continue the discussion on variables below ...
foo=baris
considered a command. The problem with foo = bar is the shell
sees the word foo seperated by spaces and interprets it as a
command. Likewise, the problem with the command X=hello world is
that the shell interprets X=hello as a command, and the word
"world" does not make any sense (since the assignment command doesn't take
arguments).
Basically, variable names are exapnded within double quotes, but not single quotes. If you do not need to refer to variables, single quotes are good to use as the results are more predictable.
An example
#!/bin/bashso the double quotes still have a work around. Double quotes are more flexible, but less predictable. Given the choice between single quotes and double quotes, use single quotes.
echo -n '$USER=' # -n option stops echo from breaking the line echo "$USER"
echo "$USER=$USER" # this does the same thing as the first two lines The output looks like this (assuming your username is cvsroot) $USER=cvsroot $USER=cvsroot
Sometimes, it is a good idea to protect variable names in double quotes.
This is usually the most important if your variables value either
(a) contains spaces or (b) is the empty string.
An example is as follows:
#!/bin/bash
X=""
if [ -n $X ]; then # -n tests to see if the argument is non empty
echo "the variable X is not the empty string"
fi
This script will give the following output:
the variable X is not the empty string
Why ? because the shell expands $X to the empty string. The expression
[ -n ] returns true (since it is not provided with an argument).
A better script would have been:
#!/bin/bash
X=""
if [ -n "$X" ]; then # -n tests to see if the argument is non empty
echo "the variable X is not the empty string"
fi
In this example, the expression expands to [ -n "" ] which returns false,
since the string enclosed in inverted commas is clearly empty.
if condition then statement1 statement2 .......... fiSometimes, you may wish to specify an alternate action when the condition fails. Here's how it's done.
if condition then statement1 statement2 .......... else statement3 fialternatively, it is possible to test for another condition if the first "if" fails. Note that any number of elifs can be added.
if condition1 then statement1 statement2 .......... elif condition2 then statement3 statement4 ........ elif condition3 then statement5 statement6 ........ fi
The statements inside the block between if/elif and the next elif or fi are executed if the corresponding condition
is true. Actually, any command can go in place of the conditions, and the
block will be executed if and only if the command returns an exit status of 0
(in other words, if the command exits "succesfully" ).
However, in the course of this document, we will be only interested in
using "test" or "[ ]" to evaluate conditions.
#!/bin/bash
X=3
Y=4
empty_string=""
if [ $X -lt $Y ] # is $X less than $Y ?
then
echo "$X=${X}, which is greater than $Y=${Y}"
fi
if [ -n "$empty_string" ]; then
echo "empty string is non_empty"
fi
if [ -e "${HOME}/.fvwmrc" ]; then # test to see if ~/.fvwmrc exists
echo "you have a .fvwmrc file"
if [ -L "${HOME}/.fvwmrc" ]; then # is it a symlink ?
echo "it's a symbolic link
elif [ -f "${HOME}/.fvwmrc" ]; then # is it a regular file ?
echo "it's a regular file"
fi
else
echo "you have no .fvwmrc file"
fi
The test command needs to be in the form "operand1
if [ 1=2 ]; then
echo "hello"
fi
gives exactly the "wrong" output (ie it echos "hello", since it sees an operand
but no operator.)
Another potential trap comes from not protecting variables in quotes.
We have already given an example as to why you must wrap
anything you wish to use for a -n test with quotes.
However, there are a lot of good reasons for using quotes all the time,
or almost all of the time.
Failing to do this when you have variables expanded inside tests can
result in very wierd bugs. Here's an example:
For example,
#!/bin/bash X="-n" Y="" if [ $X = $Y ] ; then echo "X=Y" fiThis will give misleading output since the shell expands our expression to [ -n = ] and the string "=" has non zero length.
| operator | produces true if... | number of operands |
| -n | operand non zero length | 1 |
| -z | operand has zero length | 1 |
| -d | there exists a directory whose name is operand | 1 |
| -f | there exists a file whose name is operand | 1 |
| -eq | the operands are integers and they are equal | 2 |
| -neq | the opposite of -eq | 2 |
| = | the operands are equal (as strings) | 2 |
| != | opposite of = | 2 |
| -lt | operand1 is strictly less than operand2 (both operands should be integers) | 2 |
| -gt | operand1 is strictly greater than operand2 (both operands should be integers) | 2 |
| -ge | operand1 is greater than or equal to operand2 (both operands should be integers) | 2 |
| -le | operand1 is less than or equal to operand2 (both operands should be integers) | 2 |
#!/bin/bash for X in red green blue do echo $X doneTHe for loop iterates the loop over the space seperated items. Note that if some of the items have embedded spaces, you need to protect them with quotes. Here's an example:
#!/bin/bash colour1="red" colour2="light blue" colour3="dark green" for X in "$colour1" $colour2" $colour3" do echo $X doneCan you guess what would happen if we left out the quotes in the for statement ? This indicates that variable names should be protected with quotes unless you are pretty sure that they do not contain any spaces.
The shell expands a string containing a * to all filenames that "match". A filename matches if and only if it is identical to the match string after replacing the stars * with arbitrary strings. For example, the character "*" by itself expands to a space seperated list of all files in the working directory (excluding those that start with a dot "." ) So echo * lists all the files and directories in the current directory. echo *.jpg lists all the jpeg files. echo ${HOME}/public_html/*.jpg lists all jpeg files in your public_html directory.
As it happens, this turns out to be very useful for performing operations on the files in a directory, especially used in conjunction with a for loop. For example:
#!/bin/bash
for X in *.html
do
grep -L 'gif' "$X"
done
While loops iterate "while" a given condition is true. An example of this:
#!/bin/bash X=0 while [ $X -le 20 ] do echo $X X=$((X+1)) done
This raises a natural question: why doesn't bash allow the C like for loops for (X=1,X<10; X++) As it happens, this is discouraged for a reason: bash is an interpreted language, and a rather slow one for that matter. For this reason, heavy iteration is discouraged.
Command Substitution is a very handy feature of the bash shell. It enables you to take the output of a command and treat it as though it was written on the command line. For example, if you want to set the variable X to the output of a command, the way you do this is via command substitution.
There are two means of command substitution: brace expansion and backtick expansion.
Brace expansion workls as follows: $(commands)
expands to the output of commands
This permits nesting, so commands can include brace expansions
Backtick expansion expands `commands` to the output of
commands
An example is given;:
#!/bin/bash
files="$(ls )"
web_files=`ls public_html`
echo $files
echo $web_files
X=`expr 3 * 2 + 4` # expr evaluate arithmatic expressions.
#man expr for details.
echo $X
Note that even though the output of ls contains newlines, the variables do not. Bash variables can not contain newline characters (which is a pain in the butt. But that's life) Anyway, the advantage of the $() substitution method is almost self evident: it is very easy to nest. It is supported by most of the bourne shell varients (the POSIX shell or better is OK). However, the backtick substitution is slightly more readable, and is supported by even the most basic shells (any #!/bin/sh version is just fine)